June 19, 2009

This is the day…

Teen to be tried as adult in killing
Expert: Let kids use their gadgets

This is the day

U.S. keeps watchful eye on suspicious N. Korean ship:
Also moves to protect Hawaii from missile

This is the day

Hundreds of thousands rally in Iran
Ruling cleric warns Iranian protesters

This is the day

“They are trying to control the markets by talk”
“The markets are not Almighty”

This is the day

Summer red raspberries heaping
Garden bed vines creeping

This is the day

A table meal with family
Taking up the work of the afternoon

This is the day

May 25, 2009

Memorial Day…

Every gun that it made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.  This world in arms is not spending money alone.  It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. -President Dwight D. Eisenhower

swords-into-plowshares1On this day of picnics and patriotic parades, I pause to remember those who have sacrificed much in the messiness of war.  I remember the wars that have been fought and continue to be waged in the name of the United States of America.  Afghanistan, Iraq, Persian Gulf, Vietnam, Korea, WWII, WWI, The Boxer Rebellion, Banana Wars (1898-1935), Philippine-American War (1899-1913), Spanish-American War (1898), Indian Wars (1865-1870), American Civil War (1861-1865), Continental expansion (1816-1860), War of Independence (1775-1783), Colonial Wars (1620-1774).

I contemplate the personal sacrifice of those who have given their lives in the fight.  A solemn, silent lament…reflecting on their ultimate sacrifice and the scripts which sent them into the line of fire.  I remember… my neighbor who was injured in the battle at Normandy beach.  The young Muslim soldier from Newark whose body rests under a tombstone in Arlington.  The African-American kid from the projects in Philly and the white kid from blue-collar Cleveland, Ohio–the faces of poverty whose dreams of a college education and a better life crumpled in the mountains of Afghanistan.  The brown-skinned 21-year old from El Paso, Texas  whose parents were illegals.  His red blood spilled on the brown sand of Fallujah.  The countless others whose bodies bear the marks of flying shrapnel, severed limbs and chemical burns.   I recognize the heroic, tragic loss of life.  The void of loved ones who will never return home.  Fathers…mothers…husbands…wives…sons…daughters….  The tomb of the unknown soldier…POWs….  Today I remember their sacrifice.

I meditate on war today–the sacrifices that have been made in the name of honor and freedom.  I also remember the suicides.  I remember the recent murder in Iraq of five American soldiers by a comrade who may have been driven mad by the horrors around him.  I contemplate the toll of psychological trauma on humans who have been conditioned to play the role of soldier.  To hold the decision of taking life or preserving it while looking out of a tank, out from a bunker, through the computerized graphics in an air-conditioned cubicle.

Today I remember the death from friendly fire of Pat Tillman and the shameful cover-up by the military brass.  I remember all those villagers killed by drones remotely fired in our name.  I remember these aspects of war–the collateral damage–and wonder why they aren’t part of the narrative we tell ourselves about war.  I wonder if we’ll ever remember that there was a place called Abu Ghraib on the dusty outskirts of Baghdad, and that torture took place there, for which we were responsible.

I remember all of this even as I reject the premise that wars, and the suffering they bring, are inevitable, natural acts of history.  I reflect on the human cost of war and consider the politically-driven narratives used to justify the making of war.  I honor the human sacrifice of those who have given their lives for a cause, even as I reject the myth of redemptive violence.

I remember the heroic and the tragic dimensions of war, even as many who have been a part of the historic peace church tradition migrate toward a gospel that has reconciled the cause of God with the military actions of country.  A migration toward the community church, the non-denominational independent church (of course networked with some apostolic network of their own choosing).  The metaphor name.  The earnest desire to be relevant…to see individual lives transformed.  In these spaces the gospel of peace is suspect–a peripheral non-essential to what the Good News is really about.  A fringe agenda of social justice types and liberal elites who focus on all the wrong issues, when it comes to morality and Truth.

Today I remember that Jesus came proclaiming a Gospel of peace–a non-violent revolution of solidarity with the poor–even as those in Mennonite pews or formerly Mennonite pews embrace a gospel that has made room for divine blessing of retributive justice and pre-emptive wars on terror (68% according to Kanagy’s study***…one can only assume this number is higher among those who have dropped the Mennonite label in order to be more effective in evangelism).

I remember and breathe a silent prayer for peace and ask for the courage to stand with the one whose kingdom is a peacable kingdom.  I ask for the wisdom to embody the way of peace in a world driven mad by hatred and violence.  I ask for the courage to represent a King whose dominion extends beyond the red, white and blue.  The one whose reign is made visible, not through F-16 fly-overs, but through radical acts of love, crosses, reconciliation and love for enemies.

I remember and look toward the day when “the wolf shall live with the lamb, the leopard shall lie down with the kid, the calf and the lion and the fatling together, and a little child shall lead them.”   I look for this day and seek it even now.   I ask for the courage to stand with all those who have embraced the great calling and witness of Christians in times of conflict.  In times of conflict when everyone is choosing sides, I pray for the courage to take up the plow of peace and be reconciled across national, racial, cultural, and economic barriers.

Today I remember the heroic and the tragic dimensions of war.

O God, you have bound us together in a common life.  Help us, in the midst of our struggles for justice and truth, to confront one another without hatred or bitterness, and to work together with mutual forbearance and respect; through Jesus Christ our Lord.  Amen.

***Sixty-one percent of ministers “completely
agree” that “nonviolence as a way of living is very
important to me,” compared with 40 percent of
members, and 51 percent of pastors completely
agree that it is “wrong for Christians to fight in any
war” compared with 32 percent of members.
Seventy-two percent of pastors “completely disagree”
that “the U.S. did the right thing by going
to war against Iraq” compared with 46 percent of
members who disagree.

-”A look at Mennonite Church USA ministers and members”, Conrad Kanagy, The Mennonite, February 6, 2007

May 4, 2009

The future is mestizo…

30569854In this post I want to engage the integrative motif of Elizondo–mestizajeThe Future is Mestizo:  Life Where Cultures Meet, Revised Edition, Virgilio Elizondo

Mestizaje:  the process through which two totally different peoples mix biologically and culturally so that a new people begins to emerge, e.g., Europeans and Asians give birth to Euroasians; Iberians and Indians gave birth to the Mexican and Latin American people.  (Elizondo 17)

Elizondo explores the socio-cultural dimensions of mestizaje found within his own experience of growing up as a Mexican-American in San Antonio.  The integral characteristic of mestizaje is perhaps the reality that one is a complex synthesis of two (or more) socio-cultural realities.  Elizondo describes mestizaje as an increasingly global reality that is emerging as distinctly different cultures and stories meet along border or as a result of migration.

These cultural realities meet and mingle producing a new mixture which is a rich blend of the previous generation.  Elizondo reflects on the struggle of becoming something new that challenges old social, cultural and political assumptions.  This is expressed in every area of life from food, clothing, language, customs, to religion.

A central question Elizondo raises is that of belonging.  Where am I from?  How do I belong within the current socio-cultural milieu?  These questions are inherently charged with power dynamics.  The relationship of Truth to Power is one that is undeniably messy and complex.  The postmodern suspicion of meta-narratives is born out of a close examination of the power interests which hide behind Truth-narratives.  I love this quote by John Caputo on postmodernity.  Who decides, explicitly or implicitly, who is important or privileged–who belongs.  If the future is mestizo, will there be space for the synthesis to belong…to be legitimated by the power structures and institutions.  Or, will the old politics…the old narratives perpetuate patterns of exclusion and marginalization out of fear or greed.

Elizondo seems to be projecting a vision of the new humanity that transends socio-cultural migration and synthesis.  Elizondo elevates mestizaje as an integrative metaphor for reading Scripture and perhaps even interpreting the historical process through a salvific lens.  He says for example:

A new world order is beginning to emerge.  It is beyond Marxism or capitalism, it is beyond Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, or Islam.  Something totally new is beginning to emerge.  (Elizondo 90)

I love my U.S. culture, but I refuse to adore it as if it were a god.  I am comfortable and at home in it, but I am not blinded or enslaved by it.  There are many aspects of it that need confrontation, challenge, questioning, reform, and repair if it is not going to self-destruct.  (Elizondo 91)

There is a hopefulness that germinates as old divisions are torn down and a “new humanity” emerges that is more tolerant toward the alien and stranger.  Elizondo seems to be suggesting that the mestizo future is predicated on leaving behind the colonial/imperial dispensations of power and order.  The mestizo future is only truly possible in an open democratic society that is willing to let go of hegemonic ideologies which covertly preserve a certain order.  Here we could talk about totalitarian regimes of truth which preserve the status quo through violence.

Keep reading →

April 28, 2009

Notes from Donald Miller…

donald-millerDonald Miller (Blue Like Jazz) spoke at a coffee house for emerging leaders after the worship session last evening.  His reflections centered around story.  Here are some notes.

Elements of a good story:

A character who wants something and is willing to overcome conflict to get it.

My life had become a series of random experiences.

I began to experiment with story.

The character of the character matters for the story to be good.

Screenwriters know this.  Example:  Rocky Balboa

The ambitions we have actually dictate the story.

We are designed to want things (not just in a material sense).

The point of every story is character transformation.

What do I want?  Because that will determine what my story will be about.

We live safe, meaningless lives when we settle for the dumb stories our culture pushes us into.  Stories about cars, clothes, homes…

You don’t have to win for the story to be great (i.e. Friday Night Lights movie).  You just have to give it your all…lay down your life.

The number one way we consume stories is not through books or movies…but through each other.  When we see someone living a story that is beautiful, good, and just…we are influenced to live in that way.

1.  What is the story you are currently telling (with your life)?

2.  What is the story that you want to tell?

April 27, 2009

The Suburban Christian…

Suburban Christian #3334This post is an assignment for class.  The first half will be key assertions Albert Hsu makes in the book The Suburban Christian:  Finding Spiritual Vitality in the Land of Plenty.  The second half will be my interaction with the book along with some thoughts about how this connects to my context.

Suburbia–Paradise or Wasteland?

“…suburbs are the latest version of the promise of the American frontier–blank slates on which  new residents can write their stories.”

David Brooks, “The places have no past, no precedent, no settled conventions.  The residents have no families or connections there.”

“The suburbs had always promised prosperity, upward mobility, a healthy life in an unpolluted environment, safety and tranquility, and above all, the best place to bring up kids.”  Baxandall and Ewen (11)

suburban ambivalence (11)

“Instead of an idyllic paradise or restful haven, suburban living is often hectic and frazzled.  Instead of a place of community, suburbia is often anonymous and isolated.  We find ourselves frustrated with our commutes, lacking time with friends and family, trapped by debt and consumerism.” (11)

Can we truly experience God in the suburbs?  Is it possible to live authentic Christian lives as suburban Christians?

This is the central question Hsu responds to in this book.  His thesis is shaped by the assumption that faithful Christian living in the suburbs (or in any environment) is not impossible.  At a minimum this requires discernment with other Christians who are seeking to not merely uncritically absorb all the characteristics of the suburban world.

“Poverty is suburbanizing.”  Robert Lupton

“American evangelicals have tended to have a theologically insufficient view of the city.  Many have seen cities as dens of evil and corruption…” (28)

“Our contemporary understanding of  ‘the city’ needs to include both city and suburb, and God needs Christians to have a presence throughout the entire metropolis.” (29)

The Promise of Suburbia

“Suburbia became the embodiment of a dream, a vision, a promise, appealing to the longings and yearnings of its newfound residents.” (33)

Creation, fall and redemption.

“We will see the fallenness of suburbia, and we will explore possibilities for redeeming suburbia.”

Suburban Housing and American Individualism

“Unlike every other affluent civilization, Americans have idealized the house and yard rather than the model neighborhood or the ideal town.”  Dolores Hayden (39)

“The more that individualism holds up ‘a home of your own’ as the suburban American ideal, the more demand there is for single-family housing.  The more single-family housing available, the more individualism, privatization, and isolationsism are perpetuated.” (39)

“Suburbia tends to lack ’street culture’ or ’street life’

“Suburbia is a commercial environment…a certain degree of economic and geographic determinism…”  “Most of us make housing decisions thinking more about financial limitations and constraints than any aesthetic or cultural preferences.”  (44)

“The socioeconomic stratification of suburban neighborhoods often leads to a certain degree of local socioeconomic homogeneity, where residents are isolated and separated from those of different income brackets and backgrounds.” (45)

“We should consider how Christian principles of hospitality and human dignity apply to our suburban context in regard to care for the poor,  the alien and the refugee.” (52)

“People [base] their decisions on where to reside, earn a living, shop, play and meet for worship on the basis of the automobile.”  Robert Banks (59)

“The cost of purchasing and maintaining automobiles is prohibitive for many low-income people, and limited resources are available for public transportation.”

“In many places in America now, it is not actually possible to be pedestrian, even if you want to be.”  Bill Bryson (61)

“…suburban living eroded the sense of neighborhood community.”

Sociologist Robert Putnam (Bowling Alone)-there is a direct correlation between commuting and community–the more commuting, the less community.

RECOVERING A PARISH MINDSET

“Not only is it helpful to invest in a particular geographic area, it is also important to invest a significant amount of time there.  Usually the longer we can stay in a local community, the better.  St. Benedict asked new members of his monastic communities to take a “vow of stability” rather than to wander constantly from place to place.  Many suburbanites move every few years, thus preventing them from investing deeply into local community.” (69)

“To be rooted is perhaps the most important and least recognized need of the human soul.”  Simone Weil (69)

MATERIAL WORLD:  THE CHALLENGES OF CONSUMER CULTURE

Conscientious Consumption

Consuming Locally

“Consumer culture makes us constantly aware of what we do not have.”  Aaron Freeman, in a commentary for NPR (82)

Creativity

Generosity

Simplicity

“…commercial forces militate against the emergence of distinct and unique communities.”

“the geography of nowhere”  James Howard Kunstler

“Shopping malls are a commercialized, privatized version of what used to be the public square.”

How identity shapes consumption and visa versa

Brand identities as markers for class status

Consuming Christianly

Moving from anonymity to community Keep reading →

April 20, 2009

On market-driven Christianity and biblical tea parties…

The frequent association of the church with status, wealth and force is inappropriate for followers of Jesus and damages our witness.  We are committed to exploring ways of being good news to the poor, powerless and persecuted, aware that such discipleship may attract opposition, resulting in suffering and sometimes ultimately martyrdom.

Spirituality and economics are inter-connected.  In an individualist and consumerist culture and in a world where economic injustice is rife, we are committed to finding ways of living simply, sharing generously, caring for creation, and working for justice.

–from the core convictions of the Anabaptist Network UK

teapartyx-large1Interesting the connection between Christian faith and economics. This came through in our lesson from Acts 4:32-35 yesterday. “…no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common…. There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.”

This passage makes me uncomfortable. It describes a Christianity I have not embodied.   Radical generosity and communal practices that seemingly stand on its head the dominant value system of late American capitalism which is driven by individuals pursuing what will be most beneficial to their own economic situation.   The risen Christ transforms a fearful community, cocooning behind locked doors (John 20:19-31) into bold witnesses who are credible because of their communal life–particularly made visible in their economic practices. The embryonic church is not characterized by individuals pursuing what is in their private economic interest, rather they look after the common good.  The outward expression of resurrection is love for others, mutual aid, self-sacrifice.

How might this connect to what Bono is talking about in his latest editorial for the New York Times?   Jubilee.   Debt forgiveness.  Bono identifies the kind of compassion that is a hallmark of biblical Christianity–where we find our souls.  It is a call that will require individuals with wealth and wealthy nations to consider how life might need to be re-ordered so that the common good of the planet might be realized.  Economic purists will no doubt scoff at this as so much mushy liberal do-goodism.  This is not how economic systems work.   Aid and artificial stimulus does not produce incentive and innovation needed to achieve real value in the markets.  It just produces a sense of entitlement.  So let me hang on to my money and give to charity.  The empowered individual knows best how to handle money.

The contrast is stark between a Christianity primarily driven by markets, and one informed by the biblical text.  One need not look further than the headlines of the papers in the last week to find evidence of both versions of Christianity.   On the one hand we have Christians participating in Tea Party demonstrations on tax day last week, calling for the government to take their hands off the money of individuals.  These voices would no doubt find justification for their views in the economic principles of Adam Smith (Wealth of the Nations).

On the other hand we have voices like Bono, Jim Wallis, and John Perkins calling for relocation, reconciliation, and redistribution (of wealth).  Voices like Shane Claiborne and others embodying the New Monasticism, by moving to the abandoned places of empire, practicing mercy, compassion and justice.  All these voices are imagining that to be a Christian in the way of Jesus is to be invested in far more than self-preservation or self-realization.  The question is this.  Which embodiment looks more like the embryonic Christian community described in Acts and pre-Christendom?

Economics has much to do with discipleship…much to do with the relation of the individual to the whole.  Perhaps music provides an apt metaphor as we think about a healthy relation of individuals to the whole–in politics or in the church.  I received a paper from someone working on their master’s thesis in music therapy.  The article by Julia Simon, “Singing Democracy:  Music and Politics in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s thought”, explores how music provides a medium in which the individual must be willing to “subordinate his/her own interests to the greater good of the group.”  Here is another quote along those lines:

“In music this means that each member of the ensemble will play in such a way as to maximize the beauty of the musical piece taken as a whole.  This will require some instruments or voices to be silent at times in order to allow other voices to be hear; it will require making concessions and compromises in one’s individual part in order for the piece to work as a whole.”

“Functioning together as a group in this way allows for the simultaneous expression of individual parts and the emergence of a group form: the body functioning as a whole.”

The article is discussing music theory as it relates to politics, but the themes apply to the church.  Not just to the church, but to life in the world (in relation to others…in relation to creation) from a Christian perspective.  Biblical concepts like Jubilee do not make sense from the standpoint of capitalist-driven ideology.  The economic practices of the early Christian community described in Acts 4, do not jive with the values of individual freedom…independence.

And so the debate will go.  But perhaps the tide is turning.  Perhaps, as Bono states, “capitalism is on trial” and “globalization…is in the dock.”  And as economic and planetary systems are teetering on the brink, perhaps Christians would do well to revisit the biblical text and read it again as if Jesus were speaking to us.  To read it again as if Jesus meant what he said.  To read it again as if it were not all a letter directed to the individual.  To take our cue as one part in the the larger ensemble of the transformation of all things.  This is the biblical vision–a vision of mercy, justice, beauty and love for all.

Perhaps what this historical moment requires of Christians, if not a willingness to embody the radical economic practices of the early Christian community, is at least a willingness to name the dissonance between our version of Christianity and this radical picture.  Let us allow the biblical vision for justice to be normative.  Let us be uncomfortable when we try to make Christianity something that does not challenge middle-class bourgeois existence.  Let’s have tea parties and let’s invite the rest of the world, including our enemies.  That’s a notion so radical that it just might have something to do with Jesus of Nazareth.

April 6, 2009

The hip-hop church

hip-hopThis post is an assignment for my seminary course, The Good News, Culture and Anabaptism.  The reading for this week is The Hip-Hop Church (Smith and Jackson).  The first section of this post are quotes which caught my attention.  The second part is my own reflections and comments.

“Today hip-hop is still very influential among youth and adults outside the church, yet developing ministry ‘wells’ with those living within hip-hop is not all that common.”  (47)

“the ‘well’ of common ground between the church and hip-hop must be found both inside and outside the church.”  (47)  (John 4)

“How must the church position itself in order to gain a hearing and build relationships with those living in…the strongest expression of postmodern urban culture?”  (Acts 17)  (49)

“…in this postsoul culture there is a widening gap between African American culture and the church.”  (54)

Source of empowerment/Liberation theology

“Hip-hop is an independent and unique community, an empowering behavior, and an international culture.  (KRS-ONE as quoted in Smith and Jackson, 63)

“…made people ‘feel their existence most powerfully.’”  (66)

“Hip-hop arose against the South Bronx’s backdrop of poverty, tension over economic injustices, social injustice and social change.  The children, youth, young adults and older adults trying to raise families under difficult conditions have to be heard, and often the powers that be are not listening.”  (67)

“Hip-hop takes rap….  Now a voice of a generation is being heard in order to empower an otherwise powerless class of people.”  (72)

“It is difficult for a culture that is serious about the maintenance of social arrangements, economic conditions, and political choices that create and reproduce poverty, racism, sexism, classism, and violence to display a significant appreciation for musical expressions that contest the existence of such problems in black and Latino communities.”  (Eric Dyson, Reflecting Black, quoted in Smith and Jackson, 72)

“Hip-hop gets on your nerves because it forces the listener to rethink their entire existence as it questions societal structures.  Hip-hop exposes lies and provokes thought, leaving listeners grasping for something to hold on to as their assumptions about life are challenged.”  (73)

“This is the tension about Christendom and hip-hop:  most Euro-American evangelicals are so separate from ‘the world’ that they don’t really know what issues urban people are facing.”  (81)

“…hip-hop’s sustainability does not rely on the medium of its message, rap, but on the identity it provides to a people group that have never really had an identity of their own.  Ask yourself this question:  What people group in America has had their identity taken from them and their dignity denied, has been exploited the most for others’ profit, and has had their life shaped by strife and injustice?”  (82)

“We African Americans have never really expressed our own distinctly African identity in America independent of slavery.   …Hip-hop came along as a way to bring meaning at a time when young African Americans needed a voice to proclaim what life is for them.  …For years the African American community sought to fit it, to count, but never did.  When belonging is a prevailing need, you will find a place or even create a place where you belong.  Thus hip-hop culture.  (83)

“When you don’t know the struggle of people, you don’t know the people.  Black and Latino theologians, pastors, youth ministers and poets have to speak of theology out of their social context, the struggle of poverty and disenfranchisement.  In the African American experience, struggle is a way of life and is best expressed through the arts and especially music.”  (92)

“The dominant culture–from the perspective of the minority culture–looks at life from a self-centered vantage point….  This is oppressive to those who are not a part of the mainstream culture.”  (93)

Comparing Negro spirituals to the blues, to hip-hop:  “There are three key similarities among these three musical expressions…:  a connection to liberation, a need to transfer values, and coded language.”  (95)

“…hip-hop has its own language that is distinctive to the culture it is speaking to, and it keeps the dominant community out while seeking to advance hip-hop culture.”  (96)

Who is at the table?

“the postmodern discussion among emerging Christian leaders consists mainly of young whites who grew up in the modern church complaining about what they don’t like about their daddy’s church.  It is white folks talking about white church, white Jesus and white theology.  What’s more, given that these discussions are mostly taking place outside the inner city, those around the table tend to overrepresent the socially privileged.” (105)

“Only in recent years has there been preaching and writing that has not only challenged a Eurocentric Christianity but also presented an alternative view that is more multicultural and in some cases more authentic.  Some of these voices, such as James Cone, Tom Skinner, John Perkins, Martin Luther King Jr. and Renita Weems, were those of professed Christians seeking to dismantle a Eurocentric Christianity.”  (109)

“Hip-hop culture has an influence as well as a tolerance that brings disparate people groups together.  Hip-hop culture tends to swing toward the liberal side politically; this could be partly because the liberal political agenda seems more receptive to multiculturalism than does the conservative political agenda.”  (110)

“To understand the spirituality of hip-hop, we must begin to grasp the intense quest of an oppressed people for a window of hope that can sustain life in the midst of crazy paradoxes.”  (117)

“Hip-hop’s self-awareness recognizes only that something is missing; it does not recognize what it is and where it can be found.  The church is the last place it would look for the answer.”  (119)

“The desire to welcome you and to have you “come as you are” to the African American worship experience, however, is coupled with a weakness in practical application to build sustainable faith.  It is true that the U.S. church as a whole has this flaw…” (121)

“The spirituality hip-hop offers is attractive but can’t provide consistent, holistic solutions–internal peace and sustainable life change.” (123)

“The African American church has always tended to be conservative theologically but liberal in regard to social issues.”  (123)

“The teaching of the Five Percent Nation reflects the larger drive of hip-hop:  the need to be self-supporting, self-educating and self-directed.” (127) Keep reading →

April 1, 2009

Political street theater…

gustav-dore-entry-into-jerusalem

Lent 6B

Mark 11:1-11

SMC

legion1

ima_via_crucis_andrea_joriguernica

1209grec

March 16, 2009

The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture…

0310262747In The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture, Shane Hipps advances a thesis first put forth by Marshall McLuhan–media is the message.  Hipps builds a convincing case for the way media functions as a cultural architect conditioning both the way we perceive reality/faith and the way we practice.  The book offers a convincing proof of this assertion through a broad survey of various historical developments in media–from writing systems (both phonetic and symbolic) to the proliferation of print (printing press) to the current media revolution driven by the internet.

Hipps is not calling the church to monastic escapism from engagement with the media forms of the day.  He is calling us to critically examine how these media applications will shape us in ways that either strengthen or dillute our theology of the church–primarily understood through the lens of being a missional contrast community that points to the Good News of the kingdom of God.   He says, “the power of media forms has created both challenges and opportunities in the ways the people of God are formed.” (23)

Throughout the book I was impressed by Hipps ability to hold with an open hand the possibilities offered by various media applications, while at the same time perceiving the hidden ways in which our using these forms might shape us in ways that distort the essence of what it means to be missional communities.  Hipps looks underneath the packaging of the message to examine how the message is impacted by the media we use to enact the gospel as worshipping witnessing communities. Keep reading →

March 15, 2009

Jesus confronts market-driven Christianity…

Lent 3B
March 15, 2009
John 2:13-25

1966On March 19, 1966, Texas Western College, now known as the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), put an all-black starting five on the floor for the first time in an NCAA basketball championship. That night the Texas Western Miners, led by coach Don Haskins with star players David Lattin and Bobby Joe Hill, defeated coach Adolph Rupp’s #1 ranked all-white Kentucky Wildcats, 72-65.

A symbolic threshold was crossed that continued the arduous struggle to dismantle the oppressive system of racism in this country that was built on 244 years of market-driven slavery in this country. 400 years of bigotry and injustice justified by notions of white supremacy.

In our gospel lesson today, Jesus goes rogue.  He comes unhinged.  Jesus’ words and actions in the temple must be understood as deeply symbolic–prophetic engagement.

The temple-cleansing narrative comes toward the end of the synoptic gospels (Matt., Mk., Lk.). In fact it is this act which leads to the arrest of Jesus.  John’s gospel places it much earlier in the account. Which ever is more accurate historically is not the point. In either case, this is not gentle and mild Jesus. This is deconstructionist Jesus. It is this subversive act which embodies the radical nature of his ministry—one which will ultimately be repressed through violent force by the religious establishment in collusion with the political powers.

Bill Wylie-Kellermann offers helpful background and commentary as we seek to understand the meaning of Jesus’ actions. Herod’s Temple was350px-jerus-n4i one of the larger construction projects of the first century BC (19BCE). Herod built temples for various pagan gods to serve the gentile populations, which were paid for by heavy taxes on the local Jewish population. But his masterpiece was to be the Temple of Jerusalem.

It is said that money is what makes the world go round. The temple was the economic mainstay of a city whose primary business was religious tourism. Passover was the commercial equivalent of the Christmas rush. At Passover time, Jerusalem’s population of 30,000 could be doubled or even quadrupled. That’s a lot of rooms at the inn. As many as 18,000 lambs would be slaughtered as sacrifices. We’re talking about powerful economic interests.

The temple had received special permission from Rome to collect its own tax. Pilate was able to dip into that half-shekel treasury on occasion without objection from the temple bigwigs. He built his aqueduct in part with such funds. Keep reading →